http://digitaltodd.disqus.com/enWed, 23 Jul 2008 09:29:29 -0000http://digitaltodd.com/2008/07/18/not-approved-for-comments/#comment-975715I had not heard that, but it certainly adds another dimension to the lifehacker story. It's too bad too because ultimately they are losing perspective and I would think that their advertisers would not be receptive to excluding people. I now visit the site but never click through a link I search out the topic on Google and get to the info that way.digitatoddWed, 23 Jul 2008 09:29:29 -0000http://digitaltodd.com/2008/07/18/not-approved-for-comments/#comment-975624you know, i hate it when people get all high and mighty with this social media shit. name dropping and strict rules are BS and are antagonistic attributes of what social media REALLY should be about - sharing, learning and being free!<br><br>did you hear about Gina Trapani, the editor of lifehacker, and how she blacklisted the PR community (or a lot of people in it)? She basically got annoyed and publically posted all the names and emails addresses of PR people she hated.<br><br>now...im not saying she was completely in the wrong...but her behaviour was erratic and immature....sounds like the same response that you got. seems that she is building quite the culture over there.<br><br>zzoeDiscoWed, 23 Jul 2008 09:16:37 -0000